Alternative parameterizations of Metric Dimension

A set of vertices $W$ in a graph $G$ is called resolving if for any two distinct $x,y\in V(G)$, there is $v\in W$ such that ${\rm dist}_G(v,x)\neq{\rm dist}_G(v,y)$, where ${\rm dist}_G(u,v)$ denotes the length of a shortest path between $u$ and $v$ in the graph $G$. The metric dimension ${\rm md}(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a resolving set. The Metric Dimension problem, i.e. deciding whether ${\rm md}(G)\le k$, is NP-complete even for interval graphs (Foucaud et al., 2017). We study Metric Dimension (for arbitrary graphs) from the lens of parameterized complexity. The problem parameterized by $k$ was proved to be $W[2]$-hard by Hartung and Nichterlein (2013) and we study the dual parameterization, i.e., the problem of whether ${\rm md}(G)\le n- k,$ where $n$ is the order of $G$. We prove that the dual parameterization admits (a) a kernel with at most $3k^4$ vertices and (b) an algorithm of runtime $O^*(4^{k+o(k)}).$ Hartung and Nichterlein (2013) also observed that Metric Dimension is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the vertex cover number $vc(G)$ of the input graph. We complement this observation by showing that it does not admit a polynomial kernel even when parameterized by $vc(G) + k$. Our reduction also gives evidence for non-existence of polynomial Turing kernels

Path-Contractions, Edge Deletions and Connectivity Preservation

We study several problems related to graph modification problems under connectivity constraints from the perspective of parameterized complexity: {\sc (Weighted) Biconnectivity Deletion}, where we are tasked with deleting~$k$ edges while preserving biconnectivity in an undirected graph, {\sc Vertex-deletion Preserving Strong Connectivity}, where we want to maintain strong connectivity of a digraph while deleting exactly~$k$ vertices, and {\sc Path-contraction Preserving Strong Connectivity}, in which the operation of path contraction on arcs is used instead. The parameterized tractability of this last problem was posed by Bang-Jensen and Yeo [DAM 2008] as an open question and we answer it here in the negative: both variants of preserving strong connectivity are $\sf W[1]$-hard. Preserving biconnectivity, on the other hand, turns out to be fixed parameter tractable and we provide a $2^{O(k\log k)} n^{O(1)}$-algorithm that solves {\sc Weighted Biconnectivity Deletion}. Further, we show that the unweighted case even admits a randomized polynomial kernel. All our results provide further interesting data points for the systematic study of connectivity-preservation constraints in the parameterized setting

On the complexity landscape of connected f-factor problems

Let G be an undirected simple graph having n vertices and let f:V(G)→{0,…,n−1} be a function. An f-factor of G is a spanning subgraph H such that dH(v)=f(v) for every vertex v∈V(G). The subgraph H is called a connected f-factor if, in addition, H is connected. A classical result of Tutte (Can J Math 6(1954):347–352, 1954) is the polynomial time algorithm to check whether a given graph has a specified f-factor. However, checking for the presence of a connectedf-factor is easily seen to generalize Hamiltonian Cycle and hence is NP-complete. In fact, the Connected f-Factor problem remains NP-complete even when we restrict f(v) to be at least nϵ for each vertex v and constant 0≤ϵ1, the problem is NP-intermediate

Backdoors for Linear Temporal Logic

In the present paper, we introduce the backdoor set approach into the field of temporal logic for the global fragment of linear temporal logic. We study the parameterized complexity of the satisfiability problem parameterized by the size of the backdoor. We distinguish between backdoor detection and evaluation of backdoors into the fragments of Horn and Krom formulas. Here we classify the operator fragments of globally-operators for past/future/always, and the combination of them. Detection is shown to be fixed-parameter tractable whereas the complexity of evaluation behaves differently. We show that for Krom formulas the problem is paraNP-complete. For Horn formulas, the complexity is shown to be either fixed parameter tractable or paraNP-complete depending on the considered operator fragment

Subspaces of some nuclear sequence spaces

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/23700/1/0000671.pd